20-24 September 2021
Africa/Johannesburg timezone
Thank you to everyone who contributed towards a very successful ANPC 2021! Should you require a Certificate of Attendance, please contact us via email.

Reaction processes at near barrier energies: the case of 9Be+197Au

20 Sep 2021, 15:45
2h
Gather.Town

Gather.Town

Poster Nuclear Structure, Reactions and Dynamics Poster Session 1

Speaker

Malika Kaushik (Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Ropar, Rupnagar - 140 001, Punjab, India)

Description

Recent studies of nuclear reactions involving weakly bound stable nuclei, $^{6,7}$Li and $^{9}$Be have revealed several interesting phenomena [1]. The low breakup threshold, small binding energy, and cluster structure are some of the unique features of these nuclei, which strongly influence the reaction dynamics at near barrier energies. The simultaneous measurement of complete/ incomplete fusion and direct reactions (e.g. neutron transfer) can provide insight into the underlying mechanism. With this motivation, the excitation functions for complete fusion (CF), incomplete fusion (ICF), and transfer channels have been measured in $^{9}$Be+$^{197}$Au system, over the energy range 0.76 $\leq$ E$_{c.m.}$/V$_{\rm B}$ $\leq$ 1.16 (V$_{B}$ = 38.4 MeV). The experiment was carried out at the BARC-TIFR Pelletron-Linac Facility, Mumbai, India, by employing the stack-foil technique followed by offline gamma spectroscopy with two HPGe detectors. Theoretical model calculations using CCFULL and FRESCO codes are employed to interpret the measured cross-section data. The coupled channel calculations (CCFULL) successfully describe the data at sub-barrier energies and indicate $\sim$ 40$\%$ fusion suppression at above barrier energies [2]. Further, it is observed that amongst $\rm x$+$^{197}$Au systems, where x represents stable projectiles with Z = 2-5, the enhancement in sub barrier fusion is largest for $^{9}$Be. The ground state deformation of $^{9}$Be is shown to play an important role in sub barrier fusion along with the weak binding.
At sub barrier energies, the transfer process has been found to be dominant [3] in $^{9}$Be+$^{197}$Au, and the ratio of transfer to CF cross-sections is considerably higher in comparison to $^{6,7}$Li+$^{197}$Au systems. The CRC calculations for 1$n$-stripping ($^{198}$Au) highlight the role of 2+ resonance state of $^{8}$Be, as it provides better matching with the Q-value (4.85 MeV) of the reaction. The present studies indicate that observed differences amongst reactions with $^{6,7}$Li, $^{9}$Be can be attributed to the structural differences in these projectiles, and have also highlighted the impact of the large deformation as well as a spatial extension of $^9$Be nucleus. Details will be presented.

References

  1. L.F. Canto et al., Phys. Rep. 424, 1 (2006); Phys. Rep. 596, 1 (2015) and the references therein.
  2. Malika Kaushik et al., Phys. Rev. C 101, 034611 (2020).
  3. Malika Kaushik et al., Arxiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.13689.

Primary authors

Malika Kaushik (Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Ropar, Rupnagar - 140 001, Punjab, India) V. Nanal (Dept. of Nuclear and Atomic Physics, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai - 400 005, India)

Co-authors

Gupta G. (Dept. of Nuclear and Atomic Physics, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai - 400 005, India) S.K. Pandit (Nuclear Physics Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai - 400 085, India) V.V. Parkar (Nuclear Physics Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai - 400 085, India, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Anushaktinagar, Mumbai - 400 094, India) Swati Thakur (Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Ropar, Rupnagar - 140 001, Punjab, India) Dr Pushpendra P. Singh (Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Ropar, Rupnagar - 140 001, Punjab, India) A. Shrivastava (Nuclear Physics Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai - 400 085, India, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Anushaktinagar, Mumbai - 400 094, India) Prof. R.G. Pillay (Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Ropar, Rupnagar - 140 001, Punjab, India) H. Krishnamoorthy (Homi Bhabha National Institute, Anushaktinagar, Mumbai - 400 094, India, India-based Neutrino Observatory, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai - 400 005, India) K. Mahata (Nuclear Physics Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai - 400 085, India, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Anushaktinagar, Mumbai - 400 094, India) S. Pal (PLF, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai - 400 005, India) C.S. Palshetkar (Dept. of Nuclear and Atomic Physics, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai - 400 005, India) K. Ramachandran (Nuclear Physics Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai - 400 085, India)

Presentation Materials